Findy · illustration · 7 September 2026 · every picture the screens ask for
You picked felt and stitch from 14 styles, and you picked it from one picture of an easy scene. These four are the things the real screens will actually ask of it, so you can see it fail or pass before two dozen drawings get made in it. The 14 you were choosing from are still further down this page.
Each one is a real screen's job, not a pretty picture. Two are on a plain cream background and two have the whole scene built out of felt, because the one worry I put on the sheet before you chose was that people, boxes and rooms all being one material might make every screen look like the same screen.

The welcome screen: raise the camera, take the photo, come and look. Plain ground.

The nothing-found screen: perplexed, faintly amused. Whole scene in felt.

The account screen: almost no movement, and it still has to mean something. Plain ground.

A teenager and his grandfather in a shed. Whole scene in felt.
Felt can do the two things I was least sure about. It points and waves clearly, and a stitched face really can look puzzled. Those were the two that could have killed it and neither did.
It does ages and builds well. A teenager, a man in his seventies and a woman in her fifties all read as exactly what they are, which matters because you want the person chosen to suit each screen rather than one cast repeated.
And the worry was real, but it has a cheap answer: put the person on a plain background. Compare the first and third pictures with the second and fourth. On plain cream the figure is instantly the thing you look at. Inside a full felt room the person competes with the scenery and it all goes slightly brown. That matters more than looks: a drawing on an empty screen is there to carry your eye to the one thing worth tapping, and a busy room does the opposite of that.
One small thing for later. In the first picture the camera flash came back as a sparkle painted onto the phone rather than as its own separate piece. For that screen the flash has to be able to fire on its own, so it needs drawing separately when the real artwork is made. Nothing to decide now.
Kept here rather than thrown away, so you can go back and change your mind against the real pictures. The short notes under each one were written before any of them existed, from what each technique usually does. Six turned out wrong, and four of those flattered a style I had recommended to you, so they have been rewritten to describe the picture actually above them and they say where I got it wrong.

01
1950s inks, flat shapes, overprint texture where two colours cross.

02
A confident brush line and a single watercolour pass, lots of bare paper.

03
1930s railway poster: flat blocks, no outlines, deep darks.

04
Real paper shapes with scissored edges and shadows between the layers.

05
Cut felt with visible thread and a little fuzz at every edge.

06
Modelled clay with thumbprints, photographed under soft light.

07
Stitched in thread onto cloth, the weave showing through.

08
Carved block printed by hand: ragged edges, deep unbroken black.

09
Inks printed out of register, with heavy visible grain.

10
One ink pressed onto packing paper, unevenly.

11
Jointed figures lit from behind against a glowing screen.

12
People stitched in yarn on an even weave, with a fringe.

13
Glowing panes with dark leading between every piece.

14
Layers of cut paper set inside a shallow box, real shadows between.